I have
read Stefan Zweig's Twenty-Four Hours in the life of a Woman and watched
Wes Anderson's The Grand Budapest Hotel. There are a lot of similarities
between the two works.
The two
works shared the same theme of telling your story to a stranger. I think it is
an interesting concept because in today's society, the thought of telling your
whole life story to a stranger is the last thing on your mind. People do it on
social media sometimes but it can be deleted from public view or can be denied
in person. When you are telling someone in person, it is a lot harder to deny
anything. Why a stranger? I think it is because if you were to tell someone you
knew, they would be more likely to pity you. The characters in both Stefan
Zweig's literature and Wes Anderson's film do not need pity or remorse for the
events that affected them. This notion leads to a more romantic way of
presenting characters because as a society, we are used to pitying characters
like that because it is hard to feel empathy for something that has never
happened to you. In movies today, characters like this would cry and seek
comfort. In these characters, they only seek understanding and want someone
else to know their story. Why? Well, I suppose they figure someone out there
should know.
Wes
Anderson's strength as a director is the ability to recreate time periods with
more accurate film styles, color palettes, blocking of characters, and not
overdoing the use of modern technology. When people create movies now about
stories that take place in another time period, they tend to overdo it, and it
starts to look less authentic to the time period. An example of that would have
to be the newest version of The Great Gatsby. I think he direct
influence from Stefan Zweig's story content and the literary devices that he
used. Story is really big in the movie and Wes Anderson tends to take on
subjects that not a lot of other directors of our time would due to the popular
demand of other movie genres.
After
reading the novella and seeing the movie, I have come to the conclusion that
the similarities are no accident. He does use what he has taken from the author
in a way that he can twist it in his way and create his own worlds. This makes
him a good storyteller.
No comments:
Post a Comment